April 2004

--e*I*13- (Vol. 3 No. 2) April 2004, is published and © 2004 by Earl Kemp. All rights reserved.
It is produced and distributed bi-monthly through http://efanzines.com by Bill Burns in an e-edition only.

2004 Corflu Blackjack, by Earl Kemp

J.G. Ballard and the New Wave, by Bruce Gillespie

Lady in Waiting, by Victor J. Banis

My Visit With the McCauleys, by Robert Weinberg

Bad Timing, by Earl Kemp

A Letter to Martha Beck, by Earl Kemp

"Nobody Can Write This Shit Forever," by Earl Kemp

"The Westlake Twenty-Eight," by Earl Kemp

"Come on let me see you shake your tail feathers….," by Earl Kemp

Tiptoe Through the Twilltone With Me, by Earl Kemp

Partying at the Economous, by Earl Kemp

The Man Who Stayed for Dinner, by P.H. Economou

In Donald E. Westlake's Brothers Keepers, a monk trying to save his ancient Park Avenue monastery from the clutches of a vile developer considers appealing to a fellow of Irish extraction whose name is Flattery. But he is told, "Flattery will get you nowhere."
               --D. Gary Grady

EDITORIAL:
2004 Corflu Blackjack

By Earl Kemp

[Corflu Blackjack 21, March 18-21, 2004, Plaza Hotel, Las Vegas, NV. Hosts: Ken and Aileen Forman and Ben and Cathy Wilson. Backup: Arnie and Joyce Katz, and Tracy Benton at www.corflu.org who brought all the pieces together.]

This is not a conreport. It is my impressionistic view of having been to Las Vegas and seen for myself, first hand, what all the self-satisfied, personal-egoed, in-group chortling and hinting has been all about leading up to it.

Earl Kemp (EL)

Besides that, it was my first opportunity to meet my eI cohort, Bill Burns, and to spend some quality time with him. But that was the added extra thrown in for nothing 25% additional for free part. All the rest of those reprobates congregated in Sin City could have made me want to be with them even without Bill.

They say the cliché is "You can't go home again," and they are certainly right about that. Even where I grew up as a child, in the boonies of Arkansas, there were wonderful things that grabbed my imagination and allowed me to run free with it. Most of those were nature related, I'd have to admit, because I felt I shared absolutely nothing in common with my contemporaries. They were the happy ones; I was constantly mourning the loss of the things I had never had but knew somehow were exclusively mine wherever and whenever they were.

I was the wiseass who felt he knew a good bit more about everything than any one of them. No way could I fit in, did I belong…I was lost and adrift in nowhere land with not the faintest prospect for any improvement in any direction. This is not to say that I had no friends, because that is certainly not true. Some of those early-on playmates are still with me today, in my heart, my memory, and sneaking a peek now and then at eI and wondering what the hell I'm talking about because not a word of it makes sense about anything.

And I still love them and they still love me.

#

When Dr. C.L. Barrett, "Doc" to everyone, took me out of the hands of my science fiction mentor, Ed Wood, and forced me to attend his special party at Beatley's on the Lake in somewhere Ohio that summer of 1952, he showed me the world. All those things I had never had and desperately wanted but couldn't even begin to identify…those were the things Docs Barrett and Smith loaded onto me. With people like Don Ford, Howard DeVore, Lou Tabakow, Fred Prophet, Robert Bloch, and a handful of authentic BNFs figuratively carrying me around from their shoulders on a sedan chair leading me through the portals of active fandom there is no way I could ever go backward.

I was hooked, through and through, forever.

I was home.

#

A bit later, wheeling and dealing and assembling a group of local Chicago actifans, I went for what was the biggest prize at that point in time, the (shudder and quake) World Science Fiction Convention. It took a few years of politicking and nonstop party hosting and favor trading and most of the usual, and all along the trail I thought of it as working toward a (two caps) Grand Homecoming. As a matter of fact, from time to time we even used "Homecoming" as a slogan for bringing the convention "home" to Chicago where, for me, WSFSing first began in 1952.

Many times during the course of my life, I have attempted to go home again, to defy that cliché and make a myth of it. And each time the cliché has won out and proved true…I really couldn't go home again. It simply wasn't there any more. Often I couldn't even recognize the street it once was on, much less find any residue leftover from it. Whole forests of my youth wiped out and replaced with tacky houses. The pond that my pals and I went skinny-dipping in was way out in the woods from where I lived, and is now the central focus of the city park, of course.

Glorious cities from the past, Guadalajara coming instantly to mind, of relaxed grandeur and idyllic laziness crumbling into filthy ruin and overrun by countless millions of population and crime and all the big city things most people abhor. Deserted beaches now sporting high-rise luxury hotels, condos, and timeshares.

You can't go home again….

#

I did.

Corflu did it for me. It certainly wasn't Las Vegas. In fact, it didn't even need a name or a place, really, besides Corflu. For all practical purposes, it could have happened anywhere in the whole world…not an identifiable city, a recognizable hotel chain name…anywhere. I would have not even walked outside the hotel were it not for the lure of special food just there within easy walking distance. I could have been in any hotel anywhere; the city didn't even exist for me.

Corflu '04 was the closest thing I have ever seen since Doc Barrett's little invitational party known as the Midwestcon in Lorraine (?), Ohio at a bat-infested, run-down, wood-frame fishing resort hotel. Where they infected me with the disease that unashamedly keeps one yearning to belong, to participate, to be…a part of home.

It had been mas o menos 25 years since I attended my last science fiction related convention. Much too long a time to go without a fix of the good stuff. Not only that, I felt as if I knew everyone who was going to be there anyway, or of them at least, and even with fore knowledge like that I still subconsciously knew they were all family as well.

#

My original plans had me arriving in Las Vegas on Friday morning just in time to go on Ken Forman's nature walk. That meant I would miss Joyce and Arnie Katz' Thursday night blowout party, and I really wanted to be there. All day Thursday I kept reprimanding myself for not taking that into consideration and being there where I knew I belonged. Steadfastly adhering to my schedule, I took the beating I was giving myself like a true fan and suffered partylessness and egoboo withdrawal instead.

Bill Burns (EL)

I made it to the Plaza Hotel in time to register, meet Ken Forman and reserve a spot on the walk, and to finally get together with HE WHO DESERVES A HUGO, Bill THE MAN Burns.

And instantly into the vans and off to the nature walk. It was a delightful trip through the Las Vegas wetlands area, where all the sewage, once filtered, drains away, trailing out across the Mojave Desert [Aside: The Mojave Indians, for whom the desert is named, occupied a large area of homeland. The Colorado River ran right through it, furnishing many delicacies. The odd thing is, those living on the east side of the river are Mohave Indians and those living on the west side are Mojave Indians.] and leaving life behind in the form of native plants and trees, and a refuge for birds and other wildlife. Some 20 odd (that's science fiction for you) people, definitely including Ken, had a grand time leisurely strolling along and sucking on water bottles as if they were the last hookah left in the trufen hashish den. All the while, Ken narrated the views and answered questions as they were asked of him.

#

Much to my surprise, several of the people who came to Corflu also came bearing gifts for me, hand-carrying them from the distant corners of the fanzine galaxy. I need to thank them here, again, for their kindnesses. Sandra Bond, all the way from the UK, Bill Burns from NY, Marty Cantor and Dwain Kaiser from LA, Richard Brandt from Tejas, and most especially Pat Virzi, also from Texas. All of you make me proud to know you. I can never thank you enough for your thoughts and your efforts on my behalf and for eI. Please don't stop.

Pat Virzi and Moshe Feder (BB)

There was food and drink aplenty always in the con suite, and most of this was prepared and cooked by Aileen Forman and Cathi Wilson, with some help from the fantabulous Joyce Katz. You could have attended Corflu without buying a single meal or drink in any one of the Plaza Hotel's several restaurants or bars. Only that is so difficult to do in Las Vegas, where the food is not only obscenely present buy cheap and good as well. That's the main reason I ate outside the hotel, that and being able to spend more quiet, personal time with very special people who mean a great deal to me. Had the convention lasted a month I still could not have had enough of those more quiet, personal times with the special people who were there all around me and shining their light right on me.

Bill Burns, of course, and I ate together frequently. We have much to say to each other and much to do for…for…I'm not quite sure yet but it's one damned good cause. Ranks somewhere right up there with getting A HUGO FOR BILL BURNS WHO REALLY DESERVES IT. Then there is Dwain Kaiser because he and I started a tradition of buffet raiding a few years ago and continue it at every opportunity.

Perhaps the culinary highlight of the trip, for me, was Saturday night's dinner with dear old friends Ted White, Robert Lichtman, and new old friend Bill Burns. At the urging of some local people, we chose a Mexican restaurant some few long blocks away from the Plaza. The recommendation was right on; the restaurant served excellent Mexican cuisine and was rated the best of the category in all of Las Vegas by several polls and standards. The structure and ambience was something entirely different…the building being what looks like a small neighborhood café circa 1940, surrounded by bails bondsmen and impound lots.

Jack Speer and Robert Lichtman (BB)

The four of us had a great meal, coming for me as it did atop the elaborate lunch buffet I had shared just a few hours earlier with Dwain Kaiser. It compared favorably with the food served in my favorite Mexican Mexican restaurants. Besides the category of seafood, Mexican is perhaps my favorite of all cuisines. I can remember nightmare stories about trying to find even one Mexican restaurant in all of Madrid. I so like Mexican food that my daughter Eydie, who is arranging a special 75th Birthday Roast for me (see www.earlkemp75.com for details) has arranged for an authentic Mexican caterer, in Mexico, to prepare and serve all the dishes for my party.

All of my friends and family are invited. You know who you are. All you have to do is check in with Eydie.

#

Ted White, who always does it to me, did it again. He was casually telling me that he and I were in Las Vegas together the first time either of us was ever there. Naturally, as I usually do, I instantly discredited everything he said, and followed that up with protests, "No, we weren't." Only we were. He is invariably right and, where it concerns me, I am wrong. In no time at all Ted had me remembering that wonderful trip we took with Nick and Noreen Falasca in a caravan to Southgate in '58. We talked about how very much Las Vegas had changed over the y ears, and Ted and me as well, and a number of other old friends, some of whom are still alive and living different lives.

Robert Lichtman, like Ted, has been a steady influence upon me and upon eI, both of them furnishing data and memories to run the mill that turns out the endless pages of run-on words signifying a brief passage of time for me, and for them, and for the rest of the family.

Joyce Worley Katz (MM)

Joyce Katz asked me how it felt being at Corflu and I instantly responded, "I'm home. This is it. This is where I belong, where I live."

The Katzes, by the way, were fantastic hosts. They made it just that much more difficult for me by telling me how much I had missed by not being at their Thursday evening party. They made up for my absence, for me at least, with the traditional Cherokee [Joyce and I both have documented heritage there] peace pipe. The fragrance of remembered fantasies.

How could it not be home…?

That's why, way up there, I said I did. I finally managed to go home again, and it was all worth the trip, Homeland Security (one extra hour negotiating a 10-mile roadblock backup at Hoover Dam…damn) and all.

#

The eating of the juicy parts began Sunday morning at 11 a.m.

Ken Forman (MM)

Ken Foreman, Ben Wilson, and all the gang gathered in the Turf Club for brunch, the official Corflu Blackjack awards banquet. Ken said that during the set-up phase one of the hotel staff had asked him, "What kind of wedding is this?"

"It's not a wedding," Ken said, "it's a family reunion."

It was my pleasure to share a table with the fabled Art Widner, as well as Murray Moore, Pat Virzi, Bill Burns (WHO ETC.), and Billy Pettit. The food, lots of breakfast and lunch dishes, was served buffet style and the seating cabaret fashion. The food was also quite good and plentiful for those capable of making additional raids on the buffet.

Ken Forman announced the Faan Achievement Awards.

Best Fanzine was Trapdoor by Robert Lichtman
Best Fanwriter was Gordon Ecklund for Trapdoor [Second place was Andy Hooper and third place was yours truly.]
Best Fan Artist was Steve Stiles
Best Fan Humorist was Andy Hooper
Fan Face Number One was Andy Hooper
Best New Fan was Peter Young

Ted White, GoH speech (BB)

For me, the biggest thrill came with:
Special Faan Achievement Award to Bill Burns for eFanzines.com, the same Bill Burns WHO ETC.

The highlight of the banquet was the Guest of Honor speech. Ted White, who certainly deserved the recognition, had his name pulled from inside a propeller beanie the evening before, so he would have time, between tokes, to prepare his speech.

He did a fantastic, amazing job of it, too, talking on the subject of "The Graying of Fandom" which included almost everyone listening to him. I believe the youngest was 35 and the upper limit unknown…just a bunch of kids….

#

The photos used in Earl's editorial were taken at Corflu Blackjack by Bill Burns (BB), Eric Lindsay (EL), and Murray Moore (MM). Many thanks to Eric and Murray for allowing eI to use their photos - photographer credits are indicated in parentheses for each image.
More photos of Corflu 21 may be seen here.
              --Bill Burns

Ahead of time, Bill and I decided to take a lot of really good pictures and post them here. As is usually the case, my camera froze, displayed "An Error Has Occurred," and promptly shut down. I couldn't revive it at all….meaning we were, from the beginning, short one camera. To fill in some of the blanks, we prevailed upon Murray Moore and Eric Lindsay to help out. We owe them many thanks for their generous cooperation.

Eric Lindsay (MM)

Murray Moore (EL)

Some people can't tell the difference between *real people* and fictional characters who "think they are" whatever this week's writer thinks they are, or need to be, at that moment.
              --Ted White

THIS ISSUE OF eI is dedicated to Corflu…the institution…and all those who have supported and cherished it through the years. It is also dedicated to two old friends from Nightstand Books, Donald E. Westlake and Alan Marshall. It is in memory of Samuel Edward Konkin III, Julius Schwartz, and Jon White.

In the mundane world, in a different lifetime, I was obsessed by the actions of the charismatic young Acapulco matador Antonio Lomelin. I wrote of this obsession in "Death in the Afternoon" in eI2. I was caught by surprise by Lomelin's suicide in Mexico on March 8, therefore part of the memory of this issue is just for Antonio. Rest in peace, old hero friend.

#

As always, everything in this issue of eI beneath my byline is part of my in-progress rough-draft memoirs. As such, I would appreciate any corrections, revisions, extensions, anecdotes, photographs, jpegs, or what have you sent to me at earlkemp@citlink.net and thank you in advance for all your help.

You are also encouraged to check out my website at www.earlkemp.com and the special roast site at www.earlkemp75.com for your continuing enjoyment.

I need to call your attention to two pieces of my in-progress memoirs included in my FAPAzine, SaFari 3.2, February 2004. They are "Dem bones…dem dry bones….," and "Flyin' Down to Rio." And both are incorporated herein by reference.

Bill Burns continues to be The Man around here. If it wasn't for him, nothing would get done. He inspires activity. He deserves some really great rewards. It is a privilege and a pleasure to have him working with me to make eI whatever it is. And also, Dave Locke continues as eI Grand Quote Master. You will find his assembled words of wisdom separating the articles throughout this issue of eI.

Other than Bill Burns and Dave Locke, these are the people who made this issue of eI possible: Dirce Archer, Victor J. Banis, H.C. Beck, Martha Beck, Robert Bonfils, Bruce Brenner, Howard DeVore, P.H. (Phyllis) Economou, Richard Eney, Bruce Gillespie, Pat Hawk, Joyce Worley Katz, William Levy, Eric Lindsay, Murray Moore, Lynn Munroe, George Scithers, Robert Speray, Donald E. Westlake, and Ted White.

ARTWORK: This issue of eI features new artwork by Charlie Williams and recycled artwork by William Rotsler and Ralph Rayburn Phillips.

1492. The teachers told the children that this was when the continent was discovered by human beings. Actually, millions of human beings were already living full and imaginative lives on the continent in 1492. That was simply the year in which sea pirates began to cheat and rob and kill them.
              --Kurt Vonnegut, Breakfast of Champions

…Return to sender, address unknown…. 5
The Official eI Letters to the Editor Column
Artwork recycled William Rotsler

By Earl Kemp

We get letters. Some parts of some of them are printable. Your letter of comment is most wanted via email to earlkemp@citlink.net or by snail mail to P.O. Box 6642, Kingman, AZ 86402-6642 and thank you.

Just to prove it, this is the official Letter Column of eI, and following are a few quotes from a few of those letters concerning the last issue of eI. All this in an effort to get you to write letters of comment to eI so you can look for them when they appear here.

Sunday February 8, 2004:

In the 60s Earl Kemp was a science-fiction fan and porn editor. The latter eventually got him a federal prison sentence for his part in an illustrated version of the President's Commission report on pornography. He has returned with an online zine called eI, mostly devoted to his memories of those days…I particularly direct your attention to the article from a reader's point of view, entitled "Monomanual Memoirs."
              --"Supergee," Arthur D. Hlavaty, LiveJournal

I love your fanzine….
              --Neil I. Belsky

Monday February 9, 2004:

Your writing in eI never ceases to amaze me. Here I am with a hundred things to do before the trip to Hawaii and I have elected to read eI12.
              --Bruce Brenner

Tuesday February 10, 2004:

I've long told myself it's easier to read stuff if it comes in electronically. Still, I usually don't read it, and even more rarely do I loc. I'm short-circuiting things now, writing a loc as I read eI. Wish me luck.

Stopa only begins to describe the surreal events of Bush's presidency. He lists some unlikely policy resulting, but doesn't go into the right-wing ideologue control of the Republicans, the willing relinquishment of civil liberties by the American people, and the most fantastic of all, that Bush still has 50% approval.

I would like to think that Canada is moving toward a police state more slowly than the US is, but recent collusion between the RCMP and FBI (Maher Arar) makes it clear that we're all in it together.

Did you buy your plot directly from Crystal Collins? Your descriptions online of your water and power adaptations are quire interesting... I've long had an interest in the desert areas, even before I spent a summer at Canyon de Chelly (1959). We're going to tour a small bit of it after Corflu.

I second Jack Calvert's observation that the reward of fanzines, or almost anything else, is in the doing rather than anything else. I am reminded of a quotation, "The object of the game is to win. That is not necessarily the object of playing the game." (The author? Here I'm having one of those moments where I can remember a lot about someone, but not his name. It came from sailing.)

Hlavaty describes the 1960s porn from the consumer viewpoint. I remember, as consumer, the 1950s, when just the idea that people went to bed together was titillating. I guess we are aroused by shaking us out of our matrix, from whatever degree of explicitness that might be.

The 1960s were followed by the 1970s, when mainstream literature had to catch up to what it was unable to present before. Suddenly anything was doable, and writers did it! In fact, it was too much, and it settled down to today's "sex is okay but don't be too obvious."

And by making sex acceptable in the mainstream, porn lost some of its market, and retreated back to the ghetto, as Hlavaty notes. I thought that freedom to publish would dry up the market for pornography totally; society wouldn't need things you looked at guiltily and put away. I was wrong, as the porn on the Internet shows. I guess that teenagers of any age need to look at something forbidden.

Thanks, Earl, for having such a rich experience and sharing it with us.
              --Jim Caughran

Tuesday February 11, 2004:

Earl, your latest posting is great. I love the material on Linda DuBreuil. Ditto on the Guadalajara porno mill. I did not know Don Gilmore except for his fascinating and valuable 2-vol. study of porn.
              --Jay A. Gertzman

Wednesday February 11, 2004:

I belatedly acknowledge getting your eI12. Have only had time to read the section about the porno queens, which I greatly enjoyed, in part for the great memories about Johnny's pig party and tales I've heard about his Momma, and partly because of your coolly classic style of writing.
              --Jerry Murray

Thursday February 12, 2004:

Just scanned parts of this issue (el12), Earl. Such fascinating stuff. Saw my Passion Pit blurb. Thanks for the plug.

Again, I marvel at your workaholic ways.

Was so good to see the skyview of your spread. Must be something-all that green in the middle of that eternity of desert. But still can't understand why a swinging fool/cosmopolite (sp?) like you would ever settle so far from "civilization."

Will venture deeper into the issue when time permits. Stocks never sleep.
              --Tomas Ramirez

Wednesday February 18, 2004:

Last eI was excellent--I recommended it to a lot of folk, mostly non- or lapsed fans. But then the same could be said for the previous issues.
              --Harry Bell

Friday February 20, 2004:

See? I didn't wait for the PDF file to arrive after all. Here's a loc even before Bill could process it. Time for some comments on the enormous eI12.

Jon Stopa brings up one of my favourite SF tropes, the alternate universe/timeline idea. I think one universe is more than enough, but if there are an infinite number of me out there somewhere, I hope they're doing a little better than this particular me is. Should I feel guilty because I'm pulling down the bell curve of all possible mes? This universe is too tough...I'd like to switch to one where there's justice for all, and it's not so difficult to make a living. (Maybe we're now living in the Star Trek mirror universe. It's as good an explanation as any for the insane headlines I've been reading over the past three years or so.)

As you bask in the sunshine and heat of Arizona, I'm sure you've turned on your radio or television to find that the Maritime provinces of Canada have been dealt what's called a weather bomb, where a drastic drop in the barometric pressure brings on a huge storm. The weather bomb in this case was especially powerful, and dropped a full yard of snow on Halifax, which bore the brunt of the whole mess. Most of the Maritime provinces have been entirely shut down until the storm passes on its way to Newfoundland, and they can have a look to see where they can shovel all that snow.

I just checked out www.earlkemp.com and www.earlkemp75.com. The first one shows me where you've been, and the second where you're going. You're going to a helluva party in October, and I wish I could be there to party with you. Yvonne lived in the San Diego area (Chula Vista, National City, San Ysidro) for a couple of years back in the early 70s. She showed me all her favourite haunts when we were in LA and SD for the 1984 Worldcon.

Jack Calvert's letter makes me wonder if the truly ephemeral part of a fanzine is the paper it's printed on. I prefer paper zines, but the writing can survive the paper if it's preserved some way, on a website or CD-R. I don't know how long a website can last, or how long Bill Burns will want to keep eFanzines.com going, but saving those PDF files onto a CD might preserve them until another printing method comes along, or there's a more permanent electronic storage method. Or do we go with the true meaning of ephemera, and let it all go into the memories of a dwindling few?

I'm not sure if Hannes Bok ever got the recognition he deserved from science fiction and from fandom. Seeing what kind of character he was, he should have fit in with fandom just right. That photo of Linda DuBreuil reminds me somehow of Bjo Trimble...tiny but tough, and full of energy. Did any of Don Gilmore's porn writers ever break into science fiction writing, and would we recognize their names.

As I'm doing a little proofreading for a music publishing company these days (just a temp assignment, but it's keeping the rent paid), it's always good to have a style guide to refer to. In fact, this guide would be good for just about any writer, even the part about the vocabulary.

Anyway, time to go and get this off to you. Take care, and as always, I look forward to the next issue, lucky 13. See you then.
              --Lloyd Penney.

Sunday February 22, 2004:

Frankly, Earl, eI is about the most difficult fanzine I've ever come across to write an LoC on. Maybe it's just me, but I figure that a good LoC should be at least of comparable quality with the fanzine to which it's written (which eliminates me right there), and that it should actually contribute something to the readers of the next issue. So far, I haven't come across anything in eI that gives me a base from which to do that, and for some reason I detest the idea of writing an LoC that's practically nothing but generalized and lavish Egoboo. Sorry, but that's the way things stand, and have stood for twelve issues.

I'm not suggesting that you should publish an inferior fanzine just so people like me could criticize it, or a different and less-polished one just so we can add to it.
              --Don Fitch

I'm in Norfolk, using the terminal at my son's library. He and I are flying to Prague tomorrow for a one-week visit. Will be back in USA on March 2nd, will be here a few days and then back to LA--unfortunately. I truly hate LA. I brought a large hunk of your memoir with me to read on the plane and I did it! Truly amazing stuff there. Would make a great edited-down book for media junkies.

I had forgotten about Bruce Elliott and The Dark Place. Hundreds of memories came reeling out of the past. The joy of knowing Frankie Robinson and Tom Scoria--the pain of so many lost friends. But you're still here and maybe I'll see you [at the Los Angeles Paperback Show] in April.

I was unaware you were on Terminal Island. I would have visited you. I thought you were in New Mexico of somewhere. Leave it to Harlan to come through for a friend. He has to be the most loyal and truthful person on the planet. I know absolutely that if I'm in trouble I need only to pick up the phone. Harlan is always there for you. I guess all current trufan news is online. If I had the time, money and energy, I might get a Dell. But when would I use it? I'm still working two part-times jobs to pay for the earthquake damage. Believe me, the trip to Prague was charged. I wanted to go before my vision left completely. love to all
your correspondents.
              --Noreen Shaw

Saturday February 28, 2004:

Below is the text from a recent loc I wrote Marty Cantor, of course it is an loc on back issues, so I don't expect him to print it. Therefore I am forwarding those two paragraphs to you.

"Heinlein Happens" --- very informative reading. I suppose this is why you sent me the issue. Or to rephrase, I may have asked you to send me this because of this material. When I read the readers' response to this in the subsequent issue, my feeling was, "Oh boo hoo, did Earl Kemp poke some holes into the Great God Heinlein?" Being a fantasy fan and faanish fan, I have read little, if any at all, of Heinlein's fiction (or his non-fiction, if such exists). I have, however, recently (well, since 2000, and that's recent to a middle-aged flatulence such as myself) read fine, wonderful, candid, revelatory excerpts from Earl Kemp about his past. So it can truthfully be said that I'm more of an Earl Kemp fan than a Heinlein fan.

Nevertheless, when I first started reading it, it seemed merely as though he was someone with an axe to grind. Indeed, he seemed unnecessarily, even gratuitously insulting. The further one read, however, the further one came to understand just how much and why he resented Heinlein. He described egomaniacal behavior that ran roughshod over him and the rest of fandom. If all this, along with the excerpts from a mysterious volume on fandom in the 1960s by Richard Lynch, are true, one wonders how the MidAmeriCon committee fared with his antics during 1976? Or were there horror stories there too, about which I either never read or have mercifully forgotten?
              --Timothy Marion

[Timothy Marion is making reference to my article "Heinlein Happens" that also appeared in www.enter.net/~trove/critics/Happens/happens.html and is part of my on-going, in-progress memoirs. -Earl Kemp]

Saturday March 6, 2004:

Great Work, Earl. I have just discovered your e-fanzines and they look WONDERFUL and I
haven't even started reading them yet! I found them while researching Claire Morgan / Price of Salt which is mentioned in one of your essays. This is just the sort of sub-rosa history that the Internet is perfect for publishing...THANKS for all you hard work. (PS: Somewhere up in my attic I think I have a copy of The Illustrated Presidential Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography!).
              --Val Paul Auger

Sunday March 7, 2004:

I had to go back to eI10 more than once; at 81 pages, it's a large read for someone who often has problems seeing straight. But I did read nearly all of it, and wanted to write and thank you for making it available to others.

I wish there was a way I could remove some of the pain you've suffered, but I can't make time go backward. I feel a bit envious of your friendship with Sidney Coleman. Folk like that were few and far between while I was growing up and in my young adult years. The Vonnegut pieces were extensive and made me realize how long it's been since I've read any of his work, and how little I remember of what I have read. Having now heard quite a lot about PITFCS, I think I'll get a copy of the Proceedings from NESFA Press and read the blasted thing.
              --Jan Stinson

When I was a boy, I was for a while a science fiction fan. A lot of us were, until Sputnik. All the science fiction magazines I read before then, and all the movies and television shows I saw, assumed that outer space belonged by natural right to Americans…. And, then, out of nowhere, the Russians launched Sputnik, the first space vehicle. The Russians!

We all stopped reading science fiction then, and turned away from science fiction movies and television shows. I don't know about anybody else, but as I remember it, I turned my interest to the western. In the western, there was never any doubt who would win.
              ---Donald Westlake; The Ax, Mysterious Press, 1997

[The following article was written in Australian (mostly British) English. Every effort has been made to retain this language intact and to not translate it into US English.  --Earl Kemp]

J.G. Ballard and the New Wave:
An Australian Viewpoint

By Bruce Gillespie

J.G. Ballard

James Graham Ballard was born in 1930, so he will be 74 this year. He was born in Shanghai and interned in a Japanese civilian POW camp during World War II. This became the background of his novel Empire of the Sun (1984), his bestseller, filmed by Steven Spielberg.

His first stories were 'Escapement' and 'Prima Belladonna' in Ted Carnell's New Worlds and Science Fantasy in 1956, which was eight years before Michael Moorcock took over New Worlds and changed Science Fantasy into Impulse.

Ballard always said his main influences were Surrealist painters and early Pop Art artists. The main themes and images of his stories were of deserted landscapes and wrecked technology, that is, near-future decadence and disaster. The imagery was not that much different from what we find in the early works of Jack Vance. Ballard's early successes included 'The Waiting Grounds', 'The Sound-Sweep' and 'Chronopolis'. 'The Sound Sweep', about a chap who goes about sweeping up sounds in a vacuum cleaner, still reads well.

In 1962, Ballard began to use the phrase 'inner space' about his work: his famous quote about his own work was: 'the only truly alien planet is Earth . . . "The Voices of Time" (1960) is his most important early story, an apocalyptic view of a terrible new evolution faced by the human race' (SF Encyclopedia, p. 84).

In 1966, John Foyster expressed a slightly different view:

I cannot really comprehend what all the 'inner space' is about. Doubtless some kind soul will be able to take up six or ten pages of a future issue of this magazine explaining it to me in simple terms and then I too shall be able to grovel at the feet of the master . . . If 'inner space' as opposed to 'outer space' is simply an investigation of the character's psyche then why not say so, and admit that it is only an attempt to join the mainstream, and not sf. (Australian Science Fiction Review (first series), No. 5, December 1966, p. 16)

Ballard began a series of stories set in a decaying resort called Vermilion Sands, where, as David Pringle puts it, 'poets, artists and actresses pursue perverse whims', which was another way of saying that the motives and actions are often just a little incomprehensible.

The Drowned World first appeared in Science Fiction Adventures sporting this excellent cover painting by Brian Lewis, dated 1962.

His first novel, in 1962, was The Wind from Nowhere, based very much on the British disaster novel model made so popular in the 1950s by John Wyndham. In fact, each of the three early novels fits that category - British disaster novel - except that the source of the worldwide disaster is not particularly well explained, and the explanation doesn't matter much. In The Drowned World (1962), the world heats up and the seas rise, but the explanation for the physical action is not what interests Ballard. What is really different about this book is that the main character, Kerans, welcomes the disaster. Instead of heading north, as the rest of the humanity has done, he travels south towards the equator, into a region of steadily increasing heat and wateriness.

What's different about Ballard? The language, first and foremost. Quiet, steadily advancing sentences, almost no overt climaxes or melodrama until late in the book, with the emphasis on the thoughts of the main characters. Ballard is not concerned about what is happening, but about how the characters react to what is happening. What is different about Ballard's characters, though, is that they experience everything as intensely as possible, and make that experience into a work of art. Ballard put himself directly counter to everything that had happened in science fiction until then, and especially against the very dull landscape of SF during the early 1960s. The point of life, the Golden Age writers seemed to say, was to solve problems and overcome adversity. Ballard's characters, by contrast, take to adversity like a duck to water, and try to make things more difficult, not less difficult, for themselves.

This is the cover of the Gollancz Science Fiction Masterworks edition of The Drowned World executed by Jim Burns and dated 1999.

The extraordinary thing about Ballard's career is that he sold his short stories at all. Ted Carnell, by then the only English science fiction magazine editor and Britain's most powerful SF agent, was, from all descriptions, not a man who cared much about art. He was an old-time fan who liked a good old-fashioned story, yet he published every Ballard story that, as Ballard's agent, he couldn't sell to an overseas magazine. In his magazines New Worlds, Science Fiction Adventures and Science Fantasy, he continued to publish Ballard stories regularly. He was also publishing some very intense and literary stories by Brian Aldiss. Between the two of them, Ballard and Aldiss showed up most of the other British SF authors of the time as being just a bit pallid.

By the early sixties Ballard began to acquire not just readers in Britain but disciples. Those disciples overturned the old moneychanger and took over the temple. At about that time Ballard's 'The Terminal Beach', an almost completely surrealistic mood piece, appeared. More than anything, it signalled that Ballard was writing stories quite different from anything that had ever appeared as science fiction. Coincidentally, Nova Publications sold Carnell's magazines- or rather, they proposed to drop them altogether, but a group centred around Michael Moorcock bought them. In 1964, Moorcock, in a series of editorials for New Worlds, proclaimed the magazine was setting out in a bold new direction. Ballard was the prophet of the new direction, and Moorcock was his disciple.

As Australia's John Foyster noted sarcastically some years later, 'Who will believe that he is Gabriel when he has already been assured by a close friend that he is Ghod?' Ballard seems to have taken Mike Moorcock's crusading editorials more and more to heart, and decided to boldly go where no science fiction writer had gone before. Fortunately he had already published, for Ted Carnell, most of the stories for which we best remember him.

The rest of Ballard's career is the story of moving away from SF, then returning to it. He rode with New Worlds during its most experimental period, that is, from the end of 1967 - when it was the first SF magazine to change to quarto size and feature a wide range of pop and surrealistic artwork and photography - to 1969, when Ballard began to be adopted by British literary people. He published in the little magazines, such as ambit, and stopped appearing in New Worlds. In the meantime, he began writing what he called 'condensed novels', that is, stories in short segments with odd, emphatic little episodes that, for most readers, did not add up to much.

Such pieces included 'The Assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy Considered as a Downhill Motor Race' from 1967, and 'Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan' from 1968. At the same time, however, he was still writing Vermilion Sands stories, such as the superb 'The Cloud Sculptors of Coral D', by now for a newly opened-up American market. During the sixties Frederik Pohl published some of the dullest fiction ever produced by the human mind, but he also published Cordwainer Smith, and he introduced J.G. Ballard to America.

Ballard's later directions included very successful dips into straight realism, such as his wonderful Empire of the Sun, in which his prose becomes very readable and he tells convincing stories.

Ballard and the New Wave

Every age has its New Wave. Since the New Wave that we're talking about, there seem to have been several in the arts in general - especially in pop music in the mid 1970s, and in SF in the 1980s (the cyberpunk movement). All new waves share the same characteristic - they kick against the former practitioners of the genre, the golden oldies, the old farts, the fuddy-duddies - no matter how good or bad their work actually is or was. The new kids on the block must fire shots at the older guys.

The term New Wave ('nouvelle vague') comes from French cinema in the early 1960s, and was led not by film-makers but by film critics. Francois Truffaut, Jean Luc Godard and the other main film-makers of the French New Wave began as critics writing for the French magazine Cahiers du Cinema. The old farts against which they were reacting were rather unlucky, for they included film-makers such as Jean Cocteau and Jean Renoir, who are now seen to be much more interesting and adventurous film-makers than most of the New Wave directors.

In science fiction, the real push for a new wave came from the writers who gathered at the Ladbroke Grove home of Michael Moorcock. They were the people who took over New Worlds in 1964. They hated not only most of the writers that Ted Carnell had been publishing, but also all the Golden Age writers the Americans held up as models for good SF. Clarke, Asimov and Heinlein were particularly denigrated, as were most of the writers of their generation. The only exception that Moorcock mentioned was Alfred Bester. The writer he really liked was British surrealist Mervyn Peake (the Gormenghast trilogy).

The English New Wave was stridently anti-American, but paradoxically it depended for most of its vigour on a whole group of Americans who had moved over to Britain in the 1960s to take advantage of a strong dollar. Pamela Zoline, John Sladek, Tom Disch, James Sallis and Judy Merril were all living in London at the time. Judy Merril, the only one of them who already had a reputation as an SF writer, was promoting what she called the 'new thing' in her review columns in F&SF and in the stories she selected for her annual Year's Best Science Fiction collections.

So what was the New Wave all about? More than anything it was a feeling, an itch to scratch, an acute need for good writing and new, non-technological ideas about the future. The New Wave writers also had the feeling that the new university-educated group of young people in Britain would form an audience for a new SF that was at least as well written as the literary fiction of the period. They would flock to New Worlds and make it a best-selling magazine. For thirty years the older generation of American SF writers had been saying: why won't the literary establishment recognise how good SF is? The New Wavers said in reply: because you old guys, publishing for the pulp magazines, didn't write very well - the writers for New Worlds are as good as any of the authors reviewed in the Times Literary Supplement.

There were many peculiar results of this debate. One was that the only New Wave writers who delivered the goods were people such as Ballard and Aldiss, whose careers were well established before Moorcock took over New Worlds, or writers like Tom Disch, Roger Zelazny and Samuel Delany, who were already making a splash in America before they began to publish in New Worlds. All their first stories had appeared in Amazing and Fantastic when they were edited by Cele Goldsmith, so she should be known as the founder of the New Wave. The best pieces of fiction during the heyday of New Worlds were Tom Disch's serialised novel Camp Concentration and several of his best short stories, such as 'Casablanca'; Brian Aldiss's serialised novel An Age (later released as Cryptozoic!) and many of his best short stories and novellas, especially the Barefoot in the Head stories; and some of J.G. Ballard's weirder stories, including those that were incorporated into the novel Crash.

How successful were the masthead New Wave writers, the writers whose works were praised beyond belief by Moorcock? When I looked at Langdon Jones's website, I discovered that he has settled down to a quiet rural existence somewhere in England, and has written little since the early 1970s. All his stories are collected in one collection, The Eye of the Lens, which is very good and probably now unobtainable. James Sallis disappeared, then turned up back in America as a mystery writer. John Sladek went his own merry way, with hardly any financial success during the rest of his life, but at least he kept being published. He had a belly-laugh sense of humour, a welcome and rare quality in the pages of New Worlds. M. John Harrison, the only writer of the time who was really influenced by J.G. Ballard, has had some successful mainstream novels and collections and short stories, but has only recently received universal acclaim for his new novel Light. Harrison is the last New Waver: a very arty and artful writer, sometimes compelling and sometimes impossible to read. Giles Gordon, another New Wave writer I liked very much, stopped writing, became Britain's most successful literary agent, and died last year.

Meanwhile, the New Wave writers who had real careers were the same people who were publishing before the New Wave was proclaimed. They include Aldiss, Ballard, Disch, Zelazny and Delany. Christopher Priest, as a young fan, is credited as having labelled the New Wave as such in Peter Weston's fanzine Zenith (later Speculation). Priest did not really start his writing career until the New Wave was almost over, yet today he is one of the few writers who demonstrates the qualities the New Wavers claimed for themselves: a genuine love of words and fine writing, and an eye for brain-twisting plots that are intriguing and memorable. His new novel, The Separation, has just won the Arthur C. Clarke Award and the BSFA Award in Britain.

Whatever happened to the New Wave? In America, it was quite extraordinarily hated. Isaac Asimov preached a mighty thunderous sermon against the Old Wave some time in the 1969 or 1970, but I've never actually come across the piece he wrote. It must have been in the SFWA Bulletin. Brian Aldiss never forgave him for what he took as a personal attack on himself, whereas Asimov was obviously just covering his own back, and probably didn't know an Aldiss from a Disch. After all, if the New Wave actually caught on, who would read old fuddy-duddies like him?

The situation could have been very bad for writers like Asimov if readers had started buying New Wave novels in large quantities, but that didn't happen. Within a year or three, the Old Wave writers had arisen like mighty phoenixes. In 1973, Asimov's The Gods Themselves became the first SF novel to make to the top of the New York Times bestseller list. Shortly after, Heinlein's Time Enough for Love also made it to the top, followed by Arthur C. Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama. For the first time, science fiction writers could make real money from writing SF. That one fact alone changed SF more than all the sermons from New or Old Wavers.

All the battle about New Wave versus New Wave took place in the letter columns of the great fanzines of the time, especially in Dick Geis's Science Fiction Review. Harlan Ellison appointed himself as the guru of the American New Wave, and published in 1967 the collection Dangerous Visions, following it with Again Dangerous Visions. The problem with both anthologies is that many of the stories were not nearly as adventurous as Ellison claimed, and most of them were pretty badly written. You can see this for yourself by buying the recently re-released Dangerous Visions. Since then, Ellison has made himself a laughing stock by failing to produce The Last Dangerous Visions, some of whose stories were first bought nearly thirty years ago, and many of whose authors have died since selling stories to the collection. Nothing that was dangerous in 1970 would be thought of as dangerous now.

The real hero of the American New Wave was a quiet, unassuming man with a dry wit, who was in 1969 best known as America's best writer for fanzines. Terry Carr was then working as an editor and dogsbody at Ace Books, under the mighty thumb of Donald A. Wollheim. Wollheim didn't like New Wave, and said so in letters to fanzines, but he allowed Terry Carr to begin publishing the first series of Ace Specials. These little paperbacks, with their fabulous Leo and Diane Dillon covers, featured the most experimental and daring manuscripts that Carr could find. R. A. Lafferty was one of his first discoveries, and Past Master quite a success. So was Ursula K. Le Guin's The Hand of Darkness, a novel that was very literary without owing anything to the British New Wave. That one novel made the Ace Specials essential buying. Joanna Russ's novel of the time was And Chaos Died. One of the last of the first series of Ace Specials was Brian Aldiss' Barefoot in the Head, filled with Joycean puns and surrealistic landscapes.

The New Wave and me

I bought the first of the issues of New Worlds to be issued in the larger, more pictorial format, and I stayed with the magazine as long as possible. Every time Merv Binns sold me a copy at McGill's Newsagency, he complained about the magazine: 'I don't what they're doing these days. I don't know why people are reading this rubbish. But if you really want a copy, I can get it for you.' New Worlds was a shared secret among the Australian SF fans who thought of themselves as really in the know.

Suddenly one day Merv said: 'I can't get New Worlds this month. It's banned.' Horror! I had just begun publishing SF Commentary. The same week as New Worlds was banned from entering Australia I received a letter of comment and a subscription from an Italian reader called Gian Paolo Cossato, who was living in London. I must have mentioned the New Worlds ban in my letter to him, because by airmail a couple of weeks later Gian Paolo sent me the banned issues of New Worlds in a plain brown paper envelope.

John Foyster photographed by Gary Hoff in 1972.

What was all the fuss about? I never could work that out. Our censors were very peculiar in those days. A serial called Bug Jack Barron, by Norman Spinrad, featured, according to the Chief Censor, one scene of horribly reprehensible explicit sex, so the censor banned the five issues of New Worlds in which the book was serialised. Within two or three years, the paperback version of the book was imported and was sitting on the front counter at Space Age Books.

In reading Australian Science Fiction Review, I had already discovered that its main critics, John Foyster, John Bangsund and Lee Harding, were as fascinated by the peculiarities of New Worlds as I was. John Foyster was so incensed by New Worlds and Mike Moorcock overpraising Ballard that he wrote a series of long articles about Ballard's work, sometimes praising him and sometimes exposing him as an emperor without clothes. It was the constant santimoniousness of New Worlds that got under Foyster's skin. As he asked a number of times: what is there in the prose to demonstrate that an average New Wave story is better than a good story by Henry Kuttner or Robert Sheckley from the 1940s or 1950s?

Bruce Gillespie photographed by Jeanette Gillespie in 2001.

By 1975 the New Wave was dead. Those hotshot British literary types proved not to be interested in a literary SF magazine. Arts Council grants kept New Worlds going until the beginning of 1971. When the grant was withdrawn, the magazine disappeared. It was revived as a paperback quarterly for three or four years, and David Garnett kept trying to revive it yet again in the 1990s. The puff had gone out of the soufflé. The only real achievements of the early years of the seventies were a series of stunning stories by Keith Roberts, some brilliant pieces by Josephine Saxton and M. John Harrison, and a regular column of startling, word-drunk critical essays by a new bloke called John Clute. He exuded literary flash, and he seemed like a New Waver, but in the end he proved to be interested in the whole field of science fiction, and has outlasted the New Wave

In America, the Ace Specials died in the early seventies, Harlan Ellison turned to writing film scripts instead of promoting the New Wave, Judy Merril moved to Canada and never published another word of science fiction or about science fiction, Roger Zelazny stopped writing experimental fiction and churned out the abysmal Amber series, and Samuel Delany turned out a book called Dhalgren, the first page of whose quarter million words I nearly managed to read. American Old Wavers triumphantly preached the coming of the Permanent Wave, and we all went back to sleep again. Well, not quite. Up in Canada, William Gibson was quietly working away at a novel called Neuromancer while publishing articles in other people's fanzines. In terms of unreadability, Neuromancer was for me the ultimate New Wave novel, but it was called cyberpunk. A new New Wave had started. We're probably about due for another one.

- - -
Dated July 2003 and February 2004. Copyright 2004 by Bruce Gillespie. All rights reserved.

Sometimes stories crystallize abstract scientific concepts in ways that even experts find invigorating; Stephen Jay Gould, for example, is said to have turned to Galapagos, Kurt Vonnegut's satiric take on "survival of the fittest," for grounding when debates over evolutionary theory became too heady or too contentious.
              --Ana Marie Cox, "The Bomb and a Bad Fuse,"
              Washington Post review of In Search of Klingsor by Jorge Volpi

Lady in Waiting*

By Victor J. Banis

Lady Agatha flushes the john and stands, pulling his shorts up over his hips. He pauses, examining himself in the mirror. Why can't I be hung? He thinks, instinctively clasping his inadequate genitals in his hand. He leaves his shorts down about his hips and pirouettes, peering over his shoulder. Nice fanny, something to be thankful for. Getting a little plumb, however. (This is a sugar pill much relied-on. He has always been plump, never unpleasantly so.) Lots of men, she is well aware, prefer a little meat on the bone. Not the crewcut all-American ones, as a rule, but the Latin types, now they go for a girl with flesh.

She sighs, remembering a group of Spanish sailors-that was in Long Beach, and more years past than she wants to remember. Oh, they were sweethearts, with their oily, garlic-scented bodies and their inexhaustible passion. How many of them had there been? She makes as though to remember, although in fact she has since cherished the night in its every detail. Four of them - no, five - and just her and one other queen. God, how they burned up that beach, flinging themselves about in the sand-sand in her hair, sand in her shoes, sand in her drawers - sand, sand, sand. That had been a time.

Satisfied now that her derriere is still reasonably in shape, she pulls the skimpy Jockey shorts up and washes her hands. Must be sanitary, after all, she tells herself. Silly, the things a girl will have in her mouth in one night, and then worry about washing her hands after going to the bathroom…but then, convention…she sighs at the burden of convention, although in truth it is a burden she rarely deigns to recognize.

Finally, finished with the bathroom for the moment, she picks up the telephone from the floor where it is sitting, its long cord trailing after it, and carries it with her to the bedroom. Twenty minutes she sat in there, and not one phone call. Damn queens, too lazy to pick up the phone and dial a number.

She sits on the edge of the bed, scratching in the vicinity of her crotch, and tries to think of someone to call. Larry, that bitch, will be in bed, no doubt. Him and his chicken. One of these days, Lady Agatha assures herself, he'll get caught with some chicken, and they'll haul that one away for a long rest. Do her good, too.

She frowns as she remembers a party at which Larry-who was with a perfectly nice boy himself-literally snatched a sweet young trick away from her. He could still see Larry smiling that bitchy smile of his afterward.

She makes a mental note to call Larry, but not now-tomorrow morning, nine o'clock or so. That will burn her, getting her out of bed before the Pope on Sunday. This decision, however, leaves her still in doubt as to whom to call.

Well, it's not as though she's the only queen in the city. She flips open an address book on the table beside her and thumbs through it. Jackie - the Sister-of-us-all? No, that one wouldn't be up either, not after working all night at that stinking bar. She thumbs on, smiling finally, then replaces the book and dials the phone, waiting impatiently for an answer.

Victor Banis in The Why Not, photographed circa 1972.

Sweet little Ralph, always such a ball of fun-until he got married, anyway. Not that Joe wasn't a sweetheart-sexy thing, and all that. I could have had him myself, she remembers, which is not at all true, since she made a pass at him one night in the restroom of the Why Not and he offered only a polite response before discouraging the matter. But Lady Agatha remembers that he begged her, right there with people swishing in and out of that stinking place. Sweet little Ralph needn't think he got himself a virgin.

Not that they aren't a lovely couple. They go together rather nicely, as a matter of fact, blond and dark, tall and short. But so dull, now that they're settled down. Silly why people have to give up fun, just because they're not cruising.

She giggles at that-not cruising! Give either of them a sailor in tight pants with a bulge showing and they'd go out of their fruit minds. Dizzy queen, trying to act so pure…why the hell don't they answer their phone? She wonders, as she half listens to the ring of the phone, what it would be like if she were married, but this is only the lingering ghost of an almost forgotten and long since abandoned dream.

"Hello?" Ralph. Had to be, with that question in his voice.

"How are you, sweets?" Lady Agatha croons, giving her crotch a gentle pat. Almost without waiting for the polite answer, she begins to talk again. "Oh, I've had such a bitchy day. You know that Clara had a party last night, the sow, and didn't invite…oh, you were invited?" A pause, waiting to see if information will be volunteered. "Did you go?" Well, I don't blame you. I wouldn't have gone if I had been invited; Clara's parties are always deadly. Anyway, she called me-let's see, it must have been nine o'clock, because I had just finished washing the dishes, and I remember the news coming on as I drained the sink. Of course, I didn't tell her what I thought, never let on I knew anything about her stinking party. Up her ass, that's what I say. She wanted to know if I could go shopping with her this afternoon, so I said yes, and she'll be by in about an hour. And wouldn't you know, I saw the most gorgeous hunk of man standing outside, on the sidewalk-standing there the whole time I talked to her, and could I get that faggot off the telephone long enough to run outside and cruise it? Not on your life! Oh, God, basket to his knees, I swear it, and so obviously wanting someone to take him on."

Never once, as her monologue continues, does it occur to Lady Agatha that her listener might not be interested. After all, doesn't she call every day and recite, in great detail, everything, which is usually nothing, that has befallen her? And if it is of interest to her, it certainly should be of interest to her friends.

"Are you two coming out tonight?" she asks finally, interrupting herself in the middle of a sentence the idea of which she has forgotten.

"Umm, I don't know. I'll have to check with Joe."

She's hedging. Agatha glowers viciously at the telephone. "Now don't go giving me a stall," she warns, playful in tone. "This is the fifth time I've called to invite you two for a drink, and I'll take no excuses." It is, in reality, the third time, but she remains certain that they won't remember. As though they even care, she thinks bitterly. And me their very best friend.

"The Why Not?" Ralph asks after a pause.

"Why not?" Agatha quips in return. "About the witching hour?"

Victor Banis not posing as Lady Agatha, circa 1987.

Returning the receiver to its cradle, she contemplates whom else to call. Discovering that it is later than she thought, she jumps up and begins rummaging through the closets for something to wear. Clara will be here any second, and her not even dressed.

Dressing does not, after all, take more than a few minutes. The make-up takes longer, standing until her legs ache before the mirror over the dresser. Finally, satisfied with the result, she gives a final upward brush of her hand to her lashes, darker and more delicately curved than before, and leans intently toward the mirror. Oh, how did fairies get on without make-up? Of course, her eyes are outstanding without anything on them, but how much more glamorous they are now. A good figure is one thing, and big meat is definitely an asset, but a pair of eyes-one could say anything with one's eyes.

The chime of the doorbell interrupts her self-contemplation. The clock near the bed tells her it is three-thirty, time for Clara-Clarence, if one must be butch-to be here. A final perusal of her make-up, and Agatha leaves the bedroom, swooping down upon the waiting door and her visiting "sister."

"Clara, you old bitch, you look lovely," she screams, flinging the door open and stretching out her arms for an embrace.

"Agatha, you never looked better!" As though they had not met in years, although in fact it has been only a few days, not even a week. Like two old hens, they pick and fluff at one another, Agatha leading Clara into the parlor (so she calls it).

"Where were you last night?" Clara demands, and Agatha widens her already too large eyes and says, "The Why Not. Why?"

"I thought you'd be at my party," Clara says, and Agatha, the epitome now of innocence, exclaims, "Party? Did you have a party last night?"

"You know perfectly well I did-not two days ago I asked you to come. On the phone, don't you remember?"

"Of course, of course! You know, it completely slipped my mind," Agatha declares, although in truth she remembers no such invitation. It is possible that she has forgotten.

On the other hand, Clara, being the bitch she is might be simply trying to make up. "Well, what a pity I didn't make it. I suppose that awful Ralph and his new husband-what is that one's name, Joe?-I suppose they were there. Such a drag, those two. Calling me all the time, talking my ear off, Ralph does, and never anything to say. I let him talk me into meeting them tonight, of all things, for a drink. Can you imagine anything duller?"

Still fluttering, Clara admits that she can imagine nothing duller than meeting Ralph and Joe for a drink,, and the two prepare for their shopping expedition, already arguing over which stores they should visit.

- - -
*Reprinted from The Why Not by permission of Victor J. Banis. Copyright 1966, 2004 by Victor J. Banis. All rights reserved.

Being a woman is of special interest only to aspiring male transsexuals. To actual women it is merely a good excuse not to play football.
              --Fran Lebowitz

[The following article has a bit of history behind it. In eI11 I included a piece called "Is McCauley Burning?" In response to that, Robert Weinberg wrote a letter that appeared in "….Return to sender, address unknown….4" in eI12 that, eventually, resulted in this piece. -Earl Kemp]

My Visit with the McCauleys

By Robert Weinberg

Robert Weinberg sent this message along with his photograph: "This is fairly recent, I think. There is no truth to the rumor I am 105. My hair turned white from all of my adventures collecting art!"

I've collected original science fiction art for somewhat over thirty years, since my late 20s. During that time, I've been lucky enough to meet and interview several hundred artists in the science fiction and fantasy field. The vast majority of those interviews appeared in my book, A Biographical Dictionary of SF/Fantasy Artists, published by Greenwood Press back in 1988. But, a collector and fan's work is never done. I still keep on running into artists or their families and I still keeping interviewing them. And, if I'm lucky, I still keep on buying art from them.

That's what happened a few years ago when one day my wife stumbled across an article in a local newspaper about an art exhibit only a few miles from our house. The subject of the exhibit was "Harold's World," and featured more than a dozen paintings by a forgotten artist--Harold William McCauley. I was astonished because I knew that McCauley had moved many years ago with his family to Florida after a long career working in the advertising and science fiction fields in Chicago. He had died there in 1977, and I had never been able to contact any of his relatives. Now, I discovered reading the article, they lived about twenty blocks from my house!

After a round of phone calls, my wife and I went to the McCauley exhibit where we met Kim McCauley, one of McCauley's daughters. The McCauleys had moved back to Chicago just a few years before, and were planning to return to Florida soon after the exhibit. So, I was in luck to catch them during their brief sojourn in Illinois. I interviewed Kim about her father several times. I also spoke to a second sister (whose name I must admit I've forgotten). A third sibling, a son, no longer lived with the family. McCauley's wife, Grace, his most famous model, appearing on numerous pin-up covers done for Imagination. I never got to meet. She refused to come out and talk whenever I came by for an interview because she no longer looked liked the model in the paintings.

Harold W. McCauley was born in 1904 in Chicago and attended both the Art Institute of Chicago and the American Academy of Art. He studied under the famed artist, Haddon Sundblom, and he remained a close friend of Sundblom (the artist who created the Coca-Cola Santa Claus) for many years afterward. A large Sundblom painting, a gift from the artist, hung in the McCauley parlor. It was through Sundblom that McCauley got his first work, doing illustration art, which caught the attention of the art director at Ziff-Davis who hired McCauley soon afterward.

After working as a staff artist for Ziff-Davis for many years, McCauley followed William Hamling to Imagination, where, free of the restraints of illustrating specific stories, he painted some of the finest science fiction pinup artwork ever to appear in the field. When Hamling left for California, McCauley moved his family to Florida, where he did business illustrations and portraits until his death from a heart attack in 1977.

McCauley, a confirmed bachelor most of his life, met his wife, Grace, when she came to his house on a modeling assignment. She is the stunning subject of many of his best cover paintings. Oddly enough, McCauley is even more recognizable than his wife. McCauley had a wide face, with sparkling eyes and an engaging smile, and Haddon Sundblom often used him as a model for his advertising art. McCauley stares back at people eating cereal every day, as his is the face beneath a powdered wig that Sundblom used for the smiling Quaker on the Quaker Oats box.

…I am the artist that did the version of the Quaker Oats man currently used on all Quaker Oats products. Honest injun! It's my copy they are using, not the original that was painted by [Haddon] Sundblom.

Sundblom worked exclusively in oils on a special linen canvas. I worked only in gouache, casein, and acrylics on illustration board…. Also, I did the whole painting in that medium. I did no touching up on the original by Haddon. (I couldn't anyway because I didn't have oil paints, and you can't work over oil with water based paint.)
              --Robert Bonfils, excerpted from a letter in Illustration, January 2003

Despite repeated requests from the author, the McCauleys were not interested in selling any of Harold McCauley's paintings they still owned. While much of his science fiction artwork was donated to science fiction conventions, the family has about a dozen of his paintings in their possession, including his pin-up covers from Imagination. As a collector of science fiction artwork, I was disappointed not to be able to persuade the McCauley's to sell me one of those fabulous covers (I do own several other McCauley paintings, so I shouldn't complain). As a fan of science fiction and fantasy art, I was thrilled to learn they still exist. I've included some photos I took of the paintings for this article.

Who do you believe? Grumpy old men with beards who examine "evidence" and "facts," or someone who can channel the spirits, read the tarot, and feel the pull of distant constellations on the little elves that live inside our heads?
              --Ian David

By Earl Kemp

A few things have surfaced a bit late that should have been included in material already covered in eI. Because these are so significant, I am including them here and now with reference to where they should have appeared but didn't.

Clear? Not by me.

The first one of these inserts should appear as a sidebar inside "The Ballad of Killer Kemp" that appeared in eI1, January 2002. It follows "Who has a copy…?" and is as follows:

Aw shux, Earl, "The Ballad of Killer Kemp" isn't really much - the meter is feeble, the rhymes are incredibly far-fetched… Bloody good thing I like far-fetched rhymes, huh? But My Roscoe, rhyming 'sasphilly' with 'silly'…my poetic license should be revoked.
              --"Ted Johnstone" [Dave McDaniel], Mest 6, 1961

#

The second of these inserts should appear as a sidebar inside "The Apotheosis," by Stephen Gertz, that appeared in eI8, June 2003. It follows [Mimosa 27, December 2001] and is as follows:

I showed Maurice [Girodias] a book I had brought with me. For those who remember, [President Johnson]…had appointed a four-star commission to investigate pornography. Finding it not difficult to find fact to support the obvious, they concluded…that sexually explicit material was at best-like all art-a divine intrusion into human affairs and at worst innocuous clichés and kitsch, solitary masturbation being its predominant effect. Nixon, of curse, denounced…[Johnson's] commission. But since, by law, the text of U.S. government printed mater is uncopyrightable, an enterprising soul had made a lavish full-color Illustrated Presidential Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (1970). It was published by Greenleaf Classics, Inc. of San Diego., Maurice's sworn enemy. Photos of sperm squirting on faces? Yes. Sucking? Yes. Fucking? Yes. Hetero and homo? Yes. Groups? Yes. S&M, B&D? Yes. Whips and chains? Yes. Animals? Yes. Children? Yes. Etc.? Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Even underground cartoon strips salaciously ridiculing authority. The mind boggled. All the juice that-is-the-case was there ornamenting a dry summary written by civil servants, academics, clergymen, and judges. Maurice looked through it. Humphed. Humphed again. Finally he had to concede: "It's a brilliant job. Whoever did this is going to jail."

And indeed a voice foretold. A short time later I picked up an American magazine and saw a photo of Earl Kemp, the book's editor, under arrest. He was handcuffed, each arm held by burly federal marshals who were shoving him into the back seat of a car.
              --William Levy, "Enter Mr. Maurice," American Book Review, April-May, 1993

#

For many years, as I resisted or ignored her urgings, Martha Beck was my muse. She inherited that position from her sister-in-law Sally Rand. Before that, Josephine Baker had held that honor. It was Martha who, over the many years of my gafiation, continuously tried to get me to write my story.

I didn't think I had one. I kept protesting that I was the most nothing person I had ever met, a prototype Casper Milktoast, only Martha insisted otherwise.

"If you write it," she said, "they will come."

#

The third of these inserts has only recently been discovered among the documents in the late Henry and Martha Beck collection and returned to me. It is particularly appropriate to my memoirs because it reflects my mind-set and mental anguish at a critical point in time. It was written as a letter to Martha Beck after I had been convicted of "conspiracy to mail obscene matter" and before my sentencing. It should appear as a sidebar inside "A Stranger, and Afraid…." that appeared in eI9, August 2003 LINK. It follows the "#" time break following the paragraph beginning "Our trial began in San Diego…." and is as follows:

A Letter to Martha Beck*

By Earl Kemp

Earl Kemp and Martha Beck at ChiCon IV. Photo by Joe Sarna dated September 1982.

I know I promised you a letter… The main problem is that I have been, and am, terribly confused about the whole matter. It would be totally impossible to convey my confusion to you, short of during hours of conversation. All wound up in that confusion is a great deal of pain and mental hurt, and disappointment (in many people/things for many different reasons).

Needless to say it is my considered opinion that, now, absolutely nothing is the way I thought it was. All of my concepts of justice, of law, of legality have been proved totally untrue. What has emerged in their place is a carefully contrived charade, a farce, a piece of well-choreographed theatre bearing absolutely no relationship to anything real, or anything within the real world. If I did not know that such things were impossible, I would feel that some force far greater than any of us (something on the order of a very dictatorial government machine, or something on the order of a dictator) has preordained and spelled out exactly what should happen to who at what point in time.

We walked into the courtroom guilty and were treated accordingly by prosecution, by judge, and by jury at every single step of the proceedings (and it had always been my understanding that any person charged with any crime was always innocent until proved guilty). At no single time was any fact kind to any defendant allowed to be brought before the court. No testimony no displays no facts that could confuse the prejudged case. Absolutely no evidence or absolutely no testimony as to the guilt of any defendant was presented before the jury. In the end, we were all found guilty of 12 of the original 21 counts. A few were dropped, the balance "hung" (i.e. no decision possible by the jury).

It is very ironic indeed that those counts were for preparing and mailing an advertising brochure that was offensive to some. It is further ironic that during the time period, for several weeks before and after, that that brochure was prepared for mailing, I was in Europe. I never heard of it, never saw it (until much later, when some dead letters were returned to the office), had absolutely nothing to do with it in any fashion. Further ironic than that, when I did see it, I blew my top, it so disgusted me in an aesthetic sense (it was so boorishly, cloddishly done) that after a few screaming-shouting matches with WLH [about this and some other things], I resigned my job and quit the company.

Yet, without any evidence linking me to the thing, the jury of 12 true persons has found me guilty of preparing and mailing that very same brochure. Were it not so serious I would find it quite laughable. As it stands right now, on next Monday the 7th I go in for sentencing on the crime I have been judged guilty of but never had the opportunity to commit. At that time, on eleven counts, the maximum I can receive is 5 years and/or $5,000 each of the eleven; the twelfth maximum is 10 years and/or $10,000 fine. God only knows what the judge's decision is, or has been all along, or was dictated to him quite some long time ago.

The facts of my noninvolvement have been made well known to the judge, who refused (actually declined is the proper word) to allow them to be entered into the record or to become a part of any persons' (presumably including his own) deliberations as to my sentence.

So there you have it all in a nutshell. I am totally, irrevocably innocent of the charges as put forth before me, and of the conviction 12 true jurors have awarded me.

Therefore I am confused and injured. I have watched a long parade of incredibly plastic nonpeople appear on the witness stand mouthing meaningless words from carefully rehearsed scripts. I have seen government employees, under oath, on the witness stand, testify to outright lies to my certain knowledge.

For all of this I was totally unprepared. I have an extremely highly developed sense of truth and honesty and justice. I had made the fatal assumption that the courts of this land were the final outposts of defense to protest the innocent citizens. I was fatally wrong. Not so. There is no protection and/or defense for any citizen of this country any more. They have defeated us all, probably many long years ago. Angela is right. Ellensberg is right. The Berrigans are right. Only the individual, on the firing line, can be his defense.

And only a total, abrupt change can save any of us.

I am saddened by my experience and my discoveries. I thought better of the powers to be. I have been fucked. I also feel that there is no out for me. I have opened my mouth one time too may, consequently I shall not be allowed justice (i.e. released to go on my private way). I shall not be allowed to escape into any other world of existence (i.e. another country). I am marked and numbered. I have known for years that my every word on the telephone is of major concern to some persons.

Yet, my love, I am no one. I am not a violent revolutionary. I am not a speechmaker, a campus agitator, a troublemaker. I am just plain quiet little simple old me. Not even Joe Citizen, something infinitely less. I shudder to think what that means in terms of a powerful person. I shudder to think what any powerful person must be going through, judged on the scale of what has happened, what is happening to me.

I have lost a great deal of sleep. My entire system is shot, but it does not yet show on me. I am irritable and really (as opposed to just normally) impossible to get along with. To all practical purposes, I am a dead man.

DO NOT make the mistake of assuming that I am despondent or that I am feeling sorry for myself. No way…because in the only place where it matters at all, within my personal conscience, I am secure in the knowledge that I only do things that are right. It is not possible for me to do any authentic wrong, as it is equally impossible for me to lie about anything with any measurable significance.

My head is on right. I see very clearly. I think very clearly. I am right. I only wish this could have been something important, so I could have at least felt the martyr, rather than the confused.

Whatever the outcome, short of physical and/or mental torture (and I do not put either above Them for a moment), I shall triumph ultimately. My conviction that truth is the most important thing on this earth can't possibly be that far wrong.

And, of course, I have the comforting knowledge that one tenth of me is more man than several of Them all rolled up together.

I do hope They discover the error of Their ways while there is still time for Them, individually, to try to save Their heads, Their selves.

Martha, Henry, all…do take care. Watch yourselves at all times, They really are everywhere. Be ready to do whatever is necessary to protect yourself, when They come for you. They are such little people.

I love you.

- - -
*Excerpted from a letter dated February 2, 1972.

The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is beside the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech.
              --Justice Anthony Kennedy (1936 - )

OF ALL THE WRITERS creating sleaze during the golden years of paperback pornography, there were many standout regulars. Of that entire group, three of the better quality, high-frequency output top producers went on to write of their experiences in books about that time and that phenomenon. They are:

Hal Dresner, The Man Who Wrote Dirty Books, covered in "Futting With the F.B.I. Futter" in eI4 October 2002.

Linda DuBrieul, The Woman Who Wrote Dirty Books, covered in "H.R.H. The Queen of Pornography" in eI12 February 2004.

Donald E. Westlake, Adios, Scheherazade, as follows. -Earl Kemp

"Nobody Can Write This Shit Forever"*

By Earl Kemp

In "On Being Richard Stark," Donald E. Westlake wrote, "There are three reasons to write under a pen name, and at one time or another all three of those reasons have applied to me. As a result, I have been a longtime multiple personality, though lately showing signs of a more fully integrated character."

Then, a bit later in the same piece, Westlake wrote, "I've never been published by anybody who didn't know Richard Stark or James Blue or Tucker Coe was actually Donald Westlake (pay no attention to the man behind that curtain!); we just all maintain a fiction together to move more fiction."

Then, Dick Lochte, in an article named "Westlake and Company" in Written By (Summer 2002), wrote, "Donald Westlake is a writer blessed with both prolificacy and talent…. Westlake has written about 80 books, half under his own name and the rest under pseudonyms employed for a variety of reasons from legal to capricious. Of the official Westlakes, 10 feature the travails of a monumentally hapless gang of thieves and their brilliant but snake-bitten leader, John Dortmunder. Of the non-Westlakes, 24 lean-and-mean novels about a relentless thief named Parker are attributed to Richard Stark. The rest carry bogus bylines that range from the unremarkable (Tucker Coe, Curt Clark) to the somewhat W.C. Fieldsian (Timothy J. Culver, J. Morgan Cunningham, Judson Jack Carmichael)."

And neither Westlake nor Lochte even bothered to mention the name of Alan Marshall.

Such a pity.

By his own admission, Westlake wrote 28 Alan Marshall novels in the 1960s, but I would put that number closer to three times that amount.

Why is Alan Marshall relegated to the register of unmentionables? Why does his own creator deny him?

Alan Marshall began writing for Nightstand in 1961. It is unclear exactly which Marshalls he wrote there, or when he stopped, but it is certain that it became a house name that was used on many books, from interesting to inferior, including hardcore, well into the late '60s.
               --Lynn Munroe, List 24, 1993

Writing in Author! Author! in an article named "When Richard Stark Came Back," Westlake had this to say: "Then, in 1988, I took the job of adapting Jim Thompson's The Grifters to the screen, and the director, Stephen Frears, thought he was hiring Richard Stark. Well, hiring me and getting Richard Stark. He even wanted me to sign the screenplay Richard Stark, until I pointed out that Stark wasn't a member of the Writers Guild, and I wasn't ready to permit him to scab."

I find it impossible to believe that Westlake did not know that Jim Thompson's The Grifters was published in 1963 by the very same publisher who was publishing Westlake's Alan Marshall sleaze books. And, more importantly, that they were published from the same office and at the very same time as Westlake's Marshall books, and that the same editors (and the same art department and the same distributor) worked on both of them simultaneously.

Coincidence? Fate?

Whatever could have happened to cause Westlake to be so blind to what was going on with his own manuscripts? How could it be possible to deny so much going on right before his very eyes?

#

The Black Box crew who answered to Scott Meredith in those wonderfully sinful 1960 years was a motley crew at best. Some of them were occasional staffers of Scott Meredith Literary Agency, and others were writer new-hires, signed on with great expectations as Future Great Writers To Be.

Hal Dresner was one of the gang, and Donald "Ed" Westlake. David Case, Evan Hunter, John Jakes, Arthur Plotnik, and Milo Perichitch. Also Lawrence Block, Dave Foley, William Coons, and…. William Knoles, my personal favorite, was a latecomer to this group.

And they were right, they were certainly Future Great Writers To Be. Only if you could have looked on, watching them without their knowledge, you would have picked them as a bunch of high school jocks or college frat brothers, always joking, pulling gags on each other, trying to set each other up with sure things, the more unattractive the better. Stealing from each other in a good-natured way. Stealing pseudonyms, characters, plots, chunks of manuscripts…loose items. Like good buddies sharing a great big locker room together and drinking each other's drinks and smoking each other's cigarettes.

The early years crowd did quite a bit of socializing together, as well. They held regular meetings every Friday night allegedly to play poker, but in reality they just liked being around each other, joking about the agency, talking shop, and psyching themselves up to starting that big ominous thing lurking over them all known as Next Month's Manuscript. It would take at least that much to keep Henry Morrison happy and to keep Scott Meredith at bay. [There were women writers as well, like Marion Zimmer Bradley, but most of them were kept rather well hidden. It was essentially a male thing to write those books, or so people assumed. In reality, the women wrote much better quality pornography than the men.]

The yokels at Midwood and Nightstand Books would just have to wait their turn, nothing could interrupt "The Happy Pornographers" at play. That was the group name they gave to themselves in those halcyon days.

In "The Men Who Wrote Dirty Books" in Books Are Everything, Lynn Munroe asked Hal Dresner, "Were some of your Don Holliday books written by committee? …Block says he collaborated with you and with Westlake. And didn't you all meet for a weekly poker game?"

Dresner answered: Circle Of Sinners (Bedside Books 1220) "was an example of a collaboration that appeared under the Holliday name. Other collabs rotated among existing pen names. The weekly poker game produced one book written mostly in a ten-hour stretch: one writer at the machine while six others played cards. The purpose was to provide some funds for the widow of [Dave Foley who had recently died. Ed had a special interest in this project; Foley's widow, Sandy, became the second Mrs. Westlake.]…. The final manuscript needed some reworking as speed was a higher priority than consistency. I recall that the lead character was, at various times, called by different names; his military history was, depending upon the writer, a stint in the Marines, Air Force and Navy; and during one 24-hour period there were two sunsets and three sunrises. Still the final product was salable and, legend has it, Scott Meredith even waived his commission. If true, that is the most remarkable aspect of all."

Everyone who worked near Scott would second that in a heartbeat.

#

Two of those writers provided many headaches for a number of editors. They were Evan Hunter and Donald E. Westlake. They provided many headaches because they were conglomerates. Both of them, it seemed, had capable writer-type wives or lovers, and lots of verbal friends and unwilling students…and every one of them eager to get in on that easy money that just seemed to flow effortlessly out of Meredith's black boxes. They had no shame at all about who wrote what.

Every month, without fail, one to three manuscripts would arrive at the Porno Factory in Evanston, Illinois as having been written by those two writers. That happened for many months for a number of years. The only problem is, the contents of those black boxes might very well have not been written by either of them.

Many people have attempted to sort out the realities of the writing of "Dean Hudson's" and "Alan Marshall's" extensive output. None of them have succeeded. Even though they are otherwise reasonably accomplished bibliophiles, archivist, and researchers…they can't seem to do it.

So why do I think I can straighten them out just because I edited a whole bunch of them? In actuality, I was always the last person to know any truths about anything concerning any of the manuscripts or their origins. Scott Meredith kept all that data from me, out of fear and paranoia of being labeled America's Biggest Pornographer.

#

When I began working on my memoirs, I contacted every writer I could locate who was still alive from the beginning of that whole sleazy time. I asked each of them to help identify their output and to furnish amusing anecdotes for me to use as filler throughout my memories. Most of them cooperated, in spades, even to the extent of rereading numerous old books looking for personal identity clues just to make sure they had written them in the first place.

Donald Westlake was one of the original prime movers in the early days of sleaze. He originated the pseudonym of Alan Marshall and used it well. From time to time